Social Media Blog | Twitter Buttons | Tech Jobs Board | Venture Capital | Social Networking Directory | Widget | Submit News | Log in

Subscribe RSS Feed

Recent Posts

Most Popular Posts

Categories

Feed:


Featured Startups



Twitter Buttons
Twitter Buttons




Follow us on Twitter

Jobs

Post a Job! $20 for 30 days



 

Dmoz Selling To BOTW

September 18th, 2008 by Social Guy

 

Dmoz

Jeremy Shoemaker, of the popular Shoemoney blog, posted that the owners of Best of the Web Directory are in talks to buy Dmoz from AOL and that a “deal could be reached fairly soon.”

It is unknown whether a sale would change Google’s use of Dmoz for its own directory or would prompt Google to reconsider how much weight it gives the sites linked within Dmoz. For those who don’t know, Google is still relatively cozy with Dmoz in that it maintains a Google Directory that is a duplicate copy of the dmoz.org content. Dmoz also is still considered a great place for your site to be listed to gain premium Google link power that helps your PageRank.

Over the last year Google has made it clear they don’t like the selling of links from anywhere, especially directories. Google has also made clear that it considers the selling of inclusion in a directory tantamount to selling links. Many directories have experienced a severe lowering of their PageRank that have effectively made links (and inclusion) less valuable to potential buyers.

Since Dmoz is a free directory with moderators who decide whether a site is included or not, Google still gives their coveted Google juice to sites listed in Dmoz.

A listing in BOTW.org is not free. It charges a hefty $249.99 review fee which is a prerequisite for inclusion. BOTW makes the point in bold font that their review for inclusion is not a guarantee of inclusion in their BOTW Submit Terms of Service. Apparently Google believes there is enough editorial value in these reviews because BOTW.org still has good PageRank within its categories.

However, Google has penalized many other directories that charge for inclusion reviews. Many website owners feel that even the appearance of selling links leads to PageRank reduction. BOTW is an old, established directory with lots of quality listings similar to Yahoo, which also sells inclusion reviews and suffers no repercussions from Google either.

A few questions …

  • If BOTW buys Dmoz, will it merge the directories and charge for inclusion reviews?
  • Will Google continue to mirror the Dmoz results for its directory?
  • Will any of this impact the Google juice your sites get from Dmoz?

One thing is certain, the concept of volunteer editors that Dmoz uses is flawed. BOTW and its paid editors may be exactly what Dmoz needs to turn its quality around.

Via WebProNews

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

 

Posted in News | View Comments

  • Any progress news now? It has been nearly half a year. Tell AOL let off DMOZ!
  • Hope this will make a solid change with DMOZ service. The first thing I would love if BOTW buy DMOZ is, they can speed up their approval on a site.
  • I realise that such a tip is not necessarily a ‘basic’ one, but it is a very important one
  • Boim Lebon
    I have been trying to get listing in DMOZ for a long time and found that they do not have enough editors.

    I hope this deal will improve that situation. Thanks for sharing - interesting!
  • Christian
    hello,

    interesting blog indeed…

    type in at google “paid text links” then you see 10 advertisers for it…

    so it is ok for Google to take that money although it apparently corrupts the google index??

    doesnt make sense to me other then it is all about the money…
  • Do affiliate links count as “paid? I have Amazon links on my book reviews, which bring in commissions. I also provide the links because they’re useful to people, but I doubt I’d have them there if I didn’t get sales commissions. (Many of the books I review are obscure enough that Amazon has no reviews, and less accessible bibliographic information than I can provide myself.)

    So should I “rel=nofollow” my Amazon links?
  • Terry
    I found this blog very helpful and read many articles. I was looking for something that i could not find and i would like to ask you.

    My website had a Google PageRank of 6 that decreased to 5 during recent update of page ranks by google.

    I want to know that what should i do to make my page rank increased instead of decreasing it?

    Moreover, what factors might have effected my site's page rank? If you can indicate some factors, i may avoid them in future. And if there is something that i can do to improve my page rank, please tell me.
  • This is a good thing. Hopefully it will clear up some of the corruption of dmoz. I think a lot of people are getting sick of it.
  • It's funny, Google penalizes link-sellers, whom i dislike as well, but promotes sites like Dmoz which has no value what-so-ever...lol... Wow Google, way to set those standards!

    Business directories actually used by human searchers are easy to distinguish and should be rewarded.

    -Eg. Yellowpages, superpages, 411...

    But, useless sites like Dmoz are ranked higher and actually used by google directory. It's like saying that yahoo directory is a valuable reference. Ummm, no, Yahoo sells links. Yahoo Dir is a paid link site.
  • Is DMOZ really important anymore? Don’t the other ways to get high PR backlinks outwigh the importance of the DMOZ dinosaur?
    That being said, if BOTW does a re-vamp of DMOZ, and makes it easier to get admitted, I will welcome it.
  • Don’t under estimate BOTW they are not that small .. but yes it would be really interesting to see how much is the offer they have made to AOL.
  • I hope it works out for them… In all honesty DMOZ has become the joke of the internet. Maybe someone new can bring it back.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Copyright © 2007 - 09 by SociableBlog.com : Social Media Blog
User-posted or contributed content, unless source quoted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Public Domain License | Privacy Policy
Add to Technorati Favorites
DIGG This Blog