You are here: Home » Micro Blogging » Twitter to Charge for Commercial Use?

Twitter to Charge for Commercial Use?

Twitter

People always want to know how Twitter will make money, and at the Web 2.0 Summit, CEO Evan Williams hinted at the commercial value of the service. But that doesn’t mean advertising exactly. Contentinople quotes Williams:

“Our model isn’t advertising per se,” said Williams. “Advertising is more and more a difficult proposition. We’re going to insert a message. Twitter’s model is quite different. There is commercial information, but it is entirely opt-in. If they don’t want it they won’t receive it. We could put advertising in the content, but I don’t think we’re going to do that.”

Caronline McCarthy quotes him as saying that Twitter can “charge the people who want to use that communication channel commercially.” First of all, keep in mind that none of this is official right now, and speculation is all we really have to go on, but it sounds like we’re talking about sponsored profiles. So does this mean that companies would have to pay for the type of thing CareerBuilder is doing?

Would such a model be worth it to companies? It could be a reasonable marketing tool considering that people would have to opt-in to follow these sponsors, but would it lead to significant enough results for companies to use Twitter over other social networks where they can use profiles for free? If such a system proved efficient, would other social networks initiate similar models? Now that would turn social media marketing on its ear.

Williams’s comments really create more questions than answers, but it is certainly interesting to know that Twitter is thinking along these lines at all. It will be something to keep an eye on.

Update: Rafe Needleman has a thought-provoking look at 11 possible business models for Twitter. They range from selling advertising to selling plush “failwhales“.

About the Author : Chris Crum – Staff writer for WebProNews and iEntry Network.

About Guest Authors

Guest Authors
Please submit only news or topic related to Social Networking, Social Media, Web 2.0, Twitter, Facebook, Venture Capital, Start-ups and Press Release (related to social networking sites / Conference / etc) . So contribute now, and have your deserved share in the success of “Social Networking“.
  • http://www.twitterthoughts.com Roger

    This is a bad idea. How will Twitter determine what constitutes commercial use and what is not?

    Charging for commercial usage sounds good, but there is no bright line between a commercial user and a personal user.

    Yes, it is easy when a company is using it for customer service, but what about a CEO who is using Twitter just to communicate with like-minded users?

  • http://www.twitterthoughts.com Roger

    This is a bad idea. How will Twitter determine what constitutes commercial use and what is not?

    Charging for commercial usage sounds good, but there is no bright line between a commercial user and a personal user.

    Yes, it is easy when a company is using it for customer service, but what about a CEO who is using Twitter just to communicate with like-minded users?

  • http://www.twitterthoughts.com Roger

    This is a bad idea. How will Twitter determine what constitutes commercial use and what is not?

    Charging for commercial usage sounds good, but there is no bright line between a commercial user and a personal user.

    Yes, it is easy when a company is using it for customer service, but what about a CEO who is using Twitter just to communicate with like-minded users?

  • http://www.thekingspoker.com/ Ian

    Roger, Twitter doesn't need to determine what constitutes commercial use, it just needs to provide premium services that anyone, commercial or not, can pay to make use of. However, I suspect many such services already exist in the form of those provided by independent Twitter app providers.

  • http://www.thekingspoker.com/ Ian

    Roger, Twitter doesn't need to determine what constitutes commercial use, it just needs to provide premium services that anyone, commercial or not, can pay to make use of. However, I suspect many such services already exist in the form of those provided by independent Twitter app providers.

  • http://www.thekingspoker.com/ Ian

    Roger, Twitter doesn't need to determine what constitutes commercial use, it just needs to provide premium services that anyone, commercial or not, can pay to make use of. However, I suspect many such services already exist in the form of those provided by independent Twitter app providers.